A company called Endava did better than people expected in the last three months. They made more money and spent less, so their profits were higher. This is good news for them because it means they are doing well. Read from source...

1. The headline is misleading and sensationalized. It suggests that Endava PLC Sponsored ADR had an extraordinary performance in Q3, but it only slightly surpassed the revenue estimates by 0.25%. This implies that the company's results were not impressive enough to warrant such a positive headline.

2. The article compares Endava's earnings per share of $0.28 in Q3 to $0.72 in the previous year, without providing any context or explanation for the decline. This creates a negative impression of the company's performance and does not reflect the possible reasons behind the drop, such as market conditions, competition, or strategic changes.

3. The article uses the Zacks Consensus Estimate as the benchmark for evaluating Endava's performance, without mentioning its accuracy, reliability, or methodology. This introduces a potential bias and makes the comparison questionable. A more objective approach would be to use a wider range of sources and estimates to gauge the company's performance.

4. The article states that Endava has surpassed consensus EPS estimates three times in the last four quarters, without providing any details or analysis on how the company achieved this feat. This implies that the author is not interested in exploring the underlying factors or trends that contribute to Endava's success and focuses only on the surface-level results.

5. The article ends with a promotional offer for Benzinga Pro, which creates a conflict of interest and undermines the credibility of the author and the platform. This suggests that the article is not meant to inform or educate the readers about Endava's performance, but rather to attract them to buy the subscription service.