Some people in New Jersey want to grow and sell a special plant called cannabis, also known as pot or weed. They think they can make a lot of money from it. In Arizona, more adults are buying this plant than sick people. Some companies that sell cannabis are doing well, while others are not. A lot of people want to buy and sell the same thing at different prices, so they trade it back and forth quickly. Some experts think that cannabis will become very popular and valuable soon. They want to help people find the best ways to make money from it. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that investors are eager to know the content of pot piñatas, which suggests a humorous or playful tone, rather than a serious analysis of cannabis market trends. A more accurate and informative title could be something like "The Pot Piñata: How Cannabis Investments Are Shaping Up in Different States".
- The body of the article is divided into three sections, each focusing on a different state: New Jersey, Arizona, and Colorado. However, there is no clear connection or transition between these sections, making the structure of the article confusing and disjointed. A possible way to improve this would be to group the states by region (e.g., East Coast, West Coast, Midwest) and provide a brief overview of the cannabis industry in each region, followed by more detailed information on each state's performance and prospects.
- The section on New Jersey is mostly based on data from 2019, which is outdated and may not reflect the current situation or future potential of the state's cannabis market. Additionally, the use of terms like "interstate commerce", "home grow", and "banking" suggests that the author is not familiar with the nuances and complexities of cannabis regulation at different levels of government. A more accurate and up-to-date description of New Jersey's cannabis laws would be beneficial for readers who want to understand how they affect the market dynamics.
- The section on Arizona is mainly focused on the comparison between adult-use and medical sales, which may not be relevant or meaningful for all investors. Some readers may be more interested in other aspects of the cannabis industry, such as product innovation, consumer demand, social equity, or environmental impact. Providing a broader range of perspectives and metrics would make the section more informative and engaging.
- The section on Colorado is too brief and vague to offer any valuable insights into the state's cannabis market. It only mentions that Colorado is "ready for liftoff", but does not explain why or how. A possible way to improve this would be to provide some examples of successful cannabis businesses in Colorado, such as product categories, brands, retail models, or social initiatives, and discuss how they contribute to the state's economic and social benefits.
- The final section on stocks and stuff is mostly aimed at promoting Benzinga's PotProfits service, which may not be appropriate for an article that claims to provide unbiased and independent analysis of cannabis investments. The use of phrases like "don't make that mistake again", "experts believe", and "smoking-hot g