A new law is being suggested in Wyoming that would make it less bad if someone has a small amount of marijuana. Instead of getting arrested or fined a lot, they would only get a fine of up to $100. This idea has support from both parties and some people think it will help others feel more comfortable talking about the issue. However, it might be hard for this law to pass because it is not during a time when they usually make big changes like this. Many people in Wyoming are okay with having marijuana or making it less illegal. Read from source...

1. The title of the article is misleading as it implies that there is a marijuana decriminalization bill with bipartisan support in Wyoming House, but in reality, the bill has only been introduced and not yet voted on or passed. This creates a false impression of progress and consensus among lawmakers.
2. The article cites a 2020 survey that shows high levels of public support for legalizing cannabis possession and decriminalization, but does not provide any data or evidence to back up these claims. This raises questions about the credibility and validity of the source and the survey methodology.
3. The article quotes a state representative who says "we should have full legalization, but trying to meet people where they're at right now," which is an irrational argument that implies that the current proposal is not ideal or sufficient, but rather a compromise or a temporary measure until full legalization is achieved. This suggests that the state representative does not have a clear vision or principled stance on the issue and is willing to settle for less than what is deserved or desired by the majority of Wyoming residents.
4. The article mentions Republicans who co-sponsored the measure, but does not name them or provide any details about their motivations or reasons for supporting the bill. This creates a vague and incomplete picture of the political landscape and the potential for bipartisan cooperation on cannabis reform in Wyoming.
5. The article ends with an advertisement for Benzinga Cannabis Conferences, which is irrelevant and unethical as it tries to promote a commercial interest while pretending to be a neutral and informative news source. This undermines the journalistic integrity and credibility of the article and the publisher.