So, there are these two companies called Micron Technology and Western Digital that make special things called memory chips. These chips help store lots of information, which is very important for computers that use artificial intelligence (AI). AI is when machines can learn and think by themselves. Because more people are using AI, these two companies are making a lot more money now, as they provide the storage needed for all those smart machines to work well. Read from source...

1. The article starts with an exaggeration that Nvidia is the "obvious benefactor and leader of the AI wave" by claiming it has a 90% market share of GPUs. This statement lacks credibility as it is not backed up by any sources or data, and it ignores other competitors in the AI chip industry such as AMD, Intel, and Qualcomm.
2. The article then jumps to the conclusion that AI requires heavy-duty processing power and massive amounts of data without explaining how these two factors are interrelated or why they require memory storage chips specifically. This oversimplification fails to provide a clear understanding of the AI landscape and its impact on data storage devices.
3. The article mentions Micron Technology as one of the beneficiaries of the AI boom, but it does not explain how or why their revenues have surged due to increased demand for memory storage chips from data centers running AI workloads. This omission leaves readers without a clear connection between Micron's products and the AI market.
4. The article also introduces Western Digital as another data storage device maker that is thriving on the AI boom, but it does not provide any evidence or statistics to support this claim. It merely states that they manufacture HDDs and SSDs without discussing how these products are used in AI applications or what makes them superior to other competitors in the data storage industry.
5. The article ends with a vague statement that the benefits of the AI boom continue to trickle down to data storage device companies, but it does not elaborate on which specific companies or sectors are benefiting from this trend. This lack of detail leaves readers unsatisfied and confused about the overall impact of the AI boom on the data storage market.
6. The tone of the article is overly positive and enthusiastic, bordering on hype, without providing any balanced or critical analysis of the risks, challenges, or limitations of the AI boom for data storage devices. This unrealistic portrayal may mislead readers into thinking that investing in these companies is a guaranteed success, which could lead to disappointment and loss of capital.
7. The article uses emotional language such as "oceans of data" and "insatiable demand" to evoke strong feelings and reactions from readers without backing them up with factual or logical arguments. This rhetorical device may create a sense of urgency and excitement, but it also undermines the credibility and objectivity of the article.
8. The article is poorly structured and organized, making it difficult for readers to follow the logic and flow of the argument. It jumps from one topic to another without clear