AI is a type of computer program that can learn and think like humans. Tech companies are spending a lot of money, over $1 trillion, to make AI better and smarter. But Goldman Sachs, a big bank, says it's not sure if this is a good idea because AI is very expensive to create and use. They think AI can only solve simple problems, not the complicated ones that tech companies want it to do. So, they are worried that all this money spent on AI might not give them enough profit in return. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalist. It should be more accurate and less clickbaity, such as "Goldman Sachs Questions AI Investments By Tech Companies" or "Goldman Sachs Expresses Concern Over High Costs Of AI Technology".
- The article does not provide any evidence or data to support the claim that AI is exceptionally expensive. It relies on a single report from Goldman Sachs, which may have its own agenda or biases. A more balanced and thorough analysis would include other sources of information, such as industry experts, academic researchers, or independent evaluations.
- The article ignores the potential benefits and advantages of AI technology, both for tech companies and society in general. It only focuses on the challenges and risks, which may create a negative impression and discourage investment in AI. A more fair and comprehensive approach would highlight the opportunities and innovations that AI can offer, as well as the strategies and best practices to mitigate the costs and overcome the obstacles.
- The article uses emotional language and exaggerates the problems with AI. It mentions Google's decision to reduce its AI usage in search, which is an isolated incident that does not represent the entirety of AI applications and performance. It also implies that AI cannot solve complex problems, which contradicts the current advances and achievements of AI in various domains, such as healthcare, education, finance, etc.
- The article lacks coherence and clarity. It jumps from one topic to another without providing a clear structure or argument. It also repeats information and uses vague terms, such as "high costs", "justify those costs", "significantly decline". A more logical and precise article would have a clear introduction, body, and conclusion, with relevant examples and definitions to support the main points.

Negative

Explanation: The article is expressing a skeptical view on the potential returns of investments in AI by tech companies. It raises doubts about whether the high costs associated with AI technology can be justified by the expected benefits. The quote from Jim Covello, head of global equity research at Goldman Sachs, highlights this negative sentiment: “AI technology is exceptionally expensive, and to justify those costs, the technology must be able to solve complex problems, which it isn’t designed to do.”