Procter & Gamble, a big company that makes many things we use every day, like soap, toothpaste, and diapers, has some people who own a lot of its stock (shares) betting that the price of the stock will go down. They are buying options that allow them to sell the stock at a certain price, hoping that the stock price will drop below that price. If it does, they can make money. If the stock price stays above that price, they lose some money. This is a way for investors to try to guess what will happen to a company's stock price in the future. Read from source...

AI's critique of the article is constructive and well-written. He points out several issues with the original article, such as:

1. The title is misleading and does not accurately reflect the content of the article. The article is not about "whales with a lot of money to spend" being bearish on Procter & Gamble, but rather about options trading activity involving the company.
2. The article does not provide enough context or explanation for some of the terms and concepts used, such as options history, options trades, options contracts, open interest, volume, etc. This makes it difficult for readers who are not familiar with these terms to understand the content.
3. The article contains several grammatical and punctuation errors, which detract from the overall quality and readability of the article.
4. The article is overly focused on the negative aspects of the options trading activity, without providing any balance or context. For example, the article mentions that 35% of the investors opened trades with bullish expectations and 41% with bearish, but does not explain what these percentages mean or how they compare to historical trends.
5. The article does not provide any evidence or analysis to support the claim that whales are targeting a specific price range for Procter & Gamble. This is a significant claim, but the article does not provide any details or sources to back it up.

Please provide more information on the companies mentioned in the article, including Procter & Gamble's current position, expert opinions, and market dynamics.