So, the article talks about a thing called Chainlink, which is a type of digital money or cryptocurrency. It says that the price of Chainlink has gone down a lot in the last 24 hours, which means people are not buying it as much as before. This could be because people are worried about the future of Chainlink or because they think other digital money is better to buy right now. The article also mentions some numbers and graphs that show how much Chainlink's price has changed and how much people are trading it. Read from source...

1. The article is titled "Chainlink Falls More Than 6% In 24 hours", but it does not explain why or how the fall occurred. It only states the fact, but does not provide any context or analysis. This is misleading and incomplete journalism.
2. The article uses the term "downward trend" to describe the price movement of Chainlink, but it does not provide any evidence or data to support this claim. It is a subjective opinion, not a factual statement.
3. The article compares the price movement and volatility of Chainlink to the market average, but it does not explain what the market average is or how it is calculated. This is an arbitrary and meaningless comparison.
4. The article mentions the trading volume and circulating supply of Chainlink, but it does not explain how these factors affect the price or the market sentiment. It is irrelevant information that does not contribute to the main topic.
5. The article ends with a promotional message for Benzinga's services and products, which is inappropriate and unethical. It is an attempt to manipulate the readers and generate revenue, not to inform or educate them.

Step 1: Analyze the content of the article to identify the main topic and the tone of the author
Step 2: Determine if the article is mainly positive, negative, or neutral about the subject
Step 3: Summarize the sentiment in one word or phrase

### Final answer: Bearish