Two people who helped make a popular cryptocurrency called Dogecoin and a famous person who makes videos about technology are not happy with Apple's voice assistant, Siri. They think it is bad and not as good as other AI helpers. Apple is working to make Siri better, but some people still don't like it. The boss of Apple said there will be more exciting things coming soon in the world of AI, but he didn't tell us what they are. Read from source...
1. The headline is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that both the Dogecoin co-creator and MKBHD are strongly against Siri, while in reality they only express their dissatisfaction with it. A more accurate title could be "Dogecoin Co-Creator And MKBHD Share Critical Feedback On Apple's Siri".
2. The article focuses too much on the negative aspects of Siri and Google Assistant, while ignoring their positive features and potential improvements. A balanced approach would acknowledge both strengths and weaknesses of these voice assistants.
3. The author uses vague and subjective terms like "garbage", "worse", "bizarre" to describe the performance and user experience of Siri and Google Assistant, without providing any concrete evidence or data to support their claims. A more objective and analytical tone would be more appropriate for a news article.
4. The author also compares Siri and Google Assistant with ChatGPT, a hypothetical and unrealistic scenario that does not reflect the current state of the art in voice assistant technology. ChatGPT is a text-based model that has limited capabilities and applicability for voice interaction. A fairer comparison would be with other existing voice assistants like Alexa or Cortana, which have more advanced features and functionalities.
5. The author ends the article with an unrelated promotional link for Benzinga's Consumer Tech coverage, which seems to serve as a clickbait strategy rather than providing value to the readers. A more ethical and respectful journalistic practice would be to include relevant and informative sources and references at the end of the article instead.