A big company called Vanguard, which owns a lot of shares in another company called Disney, has decided to support Disney's bosses instead of a man named Nelson Peltz who wants to change how the company is run. This decision was made public before everyone had a chance to vote, and some people think it isn't fair. Now, we have to wait for other big shareholders to decide what they think too. Read from source...

1. The headline is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that Vanguard sided with Disney management against Nelson Peltz, but it actually states that Vanguard supports the current board and CEO, not necessarily opposing Peltz directly. A more accurate headline would be "Vanguard Supports Disney's Current Board and CEO in Proxy Fight".
2. The article lacks proper context for the proxy fight and why it is happening. It does not explain what a proxy fight is, how it works, or what are the main points of contention between Peltz and Disney management. A brief introduction to the basics of corporate governance and shareholder activism would help readers understand the stakes involved.
3. The article mentions that Vanguard is Disney's largest shareholder with a 7.8% stake, but it does not provide any information on how much Trian Partners or other shareholders own. This creates an imbalance in the presentation of facts and makes it seem like Vanguard has more influence than it actually might have. A comparison of the shareholder distribution would be useful to gauge the significance of Vanguard's support.
4. The article cites Bill Ackman's criticism of the alleged early release of voting information, but it does not provide any evidence or details on how this could affect the final vote. It also does not mention whether other shareholders or experts have expressed similar concerns or opinions. This makes the issue seem trivial and unsubstantiated, rather than a potential source of controversy or dispute.
5. The article ends with an incomplete sentence that suggests there is more to the story, but it does not follow up on it or provide any resolution. It leaves readers hanging and curious about what happened with Disney's third and fourth-largest shareholders. A proper conclusion would summarize the main points of the article and indicate whether the proxy fight was resolved or not, and how.

To make a comprehensive investment recommendation based on the article, I will first summarize the main points of the article and then analyze the potential benefits and risks of investing in Disney.