A man named Biden said he forgives some people who used a plant called cannabis in certain places. But people who work or worked in the army, called service members, cannot be forgiven if they used this plant while being in the army. This is because using cannabis in the army is seen as very bad and can cause problems for the group of people working together. However, there might be some good news for these service members later on. Read from source...

1. The article title is misleading and sensationalized. It suggests that Biden's recent cannabis pardons are irrelevant for military members, but the article itself explains that they don't apply to offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). This implies that there might still be some benefits or prospects for military members related to the pardons.
2. The article uses quotes from a law professor who claims that drug use in the military is more serious than recreational, civilian drug use because it impacts good order and discipline. However, this argument is not supported by any evidence or data, and it seems to be based on his personal opinion as an expert in military justice.
3. The article mentions a bipartisan effort that seeks legal cannabis for veterans through the VA, but it does not provide any details about how this initiative works, what are its chances of success, or how it relates to Biden's pardons. This information could be relevant and informative for the readers who want to learn more about the issue.
4. The article ends with a statistic that 77% of young Americans are not suitable for military service, according to a Pentagon study. This statement is unclear and vague, as it does not specify what criteria or factors were used to measure suitability, how reliable or valid the study is, or why this information is relevant to the topic of cannabis pardons.
5. The overall tone of the article is negative and dismissive of Biden's pardons, implying that they are not significant or meaningful for most people who use or possess cannabis on federal lands or in DC. However, this perspective might be biased or one-sided, as it does not consider the potential benefits or consequences of the pardons for other groups or individuals, such as veterans, their families, or the cannabis industry.