A person who works at a big company called Electronic Arts decided to sell some of their own shares of the company. They sold 1,000 shares and got about $134,450 from it. This happened around the same time that the company said they would lay off some workers and stop making some games.

Another person who works at a smaller company called SkyWest also decided to sell some of their own shares. They sold 2,000 shares and got about $133,430 from it. This happened after the company said they made good money in the last three months. Read from source...

1. The article is written in a very casual tone, using slang terms like "dismantling" and "chilling" to describe the actions of the insiders who are selling their stocks. This creates an impression that the author has a negative bias against these companies and is trying to influence the readers' emotions.
2. The article does not provide any clear reason or evidence for why the insiders are selling their shares, other than citing some news events related to Electronic Arts and SkyWest. This leaves the reader with a sense of uncertainty and confusion about the motives behind the insider trading activities.
3. The article does not mention any potential conflicts of interest that may exist between the author and the companies mentioned in the title, or between the author and other entities that may benefit from the decline of these stocks. This is a serious ethical issue that undermines the credibility of the source and the quality of the information presented.
4. The article does not provide any analysis or evaluation of the financial performance or prospects of Electronic Arts, Booz Allen Hamilton, SkyWest, or the other two companies mentioned in the title. This makes it difficult for the reader to assess whether the insider selling is justified or not, or whether it presents an opportunity or a risk for investors.
5. The article does not provide any context or background information on the industries or markets that these companies operate in, or how they are affected by external factors such as economic conditions, competitors, regulatory changes, or consumer trends. This limits the reader's understanding of the business environment and the challenges faced by these companies.
6. The article does not provide any sources or citations for the facts or figures mentioned in the text, making it hard to verify their accuracy or relevance. This also raises questions about the reliability and validity of the information presented.