Read from source...

- The title of the article is misleading and sensationalist. It implies that crypto is either not mainstream or it just became mainstream, when in reality, it is a matter of degree and perspective. A more accurate and nuanced title could be something like "Crypto's Progress Toward Mainstream Acceptance: Experts Weigh In".
- The article does not provide enough context and background information on the topic of crypto mainstreaming. It assumes that the readers are already familiar with the basics of cryptocurrency, blockchain, and ETFs, without explaining what they are or why they matter. This could confuse or alienate some readers who are new to the space or curious about it.
- The article does not challenge or question the opinions and assumptions of the experts interviewed. It mostly presents them as authoritative and uncontested sources of information, without critiquing their credibility, motivations, or potential conflicts of interest. For example, it does not mention that Brock Pierce is a cryptocurrency entrepreneur and presidential candidate, which could influence his views on crypto regulation and adoption.
- The article does not explore the implications and consequences of spot Bitcoin ETF approval for different stakeholders, such as investors, consumers, businesses, governments, etc. It only focuses on the perspectives of the experts and their predictions about the future of crypto. A more balanced and holistic approach would consider how spot Bitcoin ETFs could affect the market dynamics, social norms, legal frameworks, environmental impacts, ethical issues, etc.