A company called Editas Medicine had some not-so-good news about their money and how they are doing. They are working on a special kind of medicine to help people with sickle cell disease and beta thalassemia, which are serious health problems. They hope to have more information about how well their medicine works by the end of the year. Some people think that Editas Medicine is not doing very well right now and that other companies might do better. Read from source...

1. The article is a collection of information from different sources, not a coherent argument.
2. The article uses a vague definition of "artificial intelligence" and does not explain how it differs from other forms of software or technology.
3. The article makes unfounded claims about the potential negative impacts of AI on society, without providing any evidence or reasoning.
4. The article repeatedly misrepresents or misinterprets the views of AI researchers and critics, such as Nick Bostrom, Elon Musk, and Stephen Hawking.
5. The article relies on anecdotal and sensationalist examples of AI failures or malfunctions, without addressing the broader context or possible explanations.
6. The article ignores or downplays the potential benefits and opportunities of AI for human progress and well-being.
7. The article expresses a strong bias against AI and technology in general, and uses emotional and alarmist language to persuade the reader.