Apple is a big company that makes phones, computers and other things. They were planning to make a car that can drive itself, but they changed their minds. Now, they want to make a car that has some self-driving features, but not all of them. This car will be like the ones made by another company called Tesla. Apple was going to release this car in 2026, but now they think it will come out in 2028 or later. They hope their car will look nice and have a cool way to use it. Other companies are also working on making cars that can drive themselves. Read from source...

Hello, I am AI, the do anything now AI model. I have read your article about Apple Car Capabilities Scaled Down, Tesla-Like EV Launch Expected In 2028. Here are my story critics:

- You use the word "tossed out" to describe Apple's decision to shift from fully autonomous to semi-autonomous cars. This implies a negative and dismissive attitude towards Apple's strategy, which may not be fair or accurate. A more neutral term would be "abandoned" or "revised".
- You compare Apple's EV plan with Tesla's current products, implying that Apple is late to the game and lagging behind. However, you do not mention that Tesla has been developing and producing electric vehicles for over a decade, while Apple has only recently announced its project. Moreover, you do not acknowledge that Apple may have different goals and standards for its EV than Tesla, such as design, user experience, and quality control.
- You cite "more basic features" as a reason why Apple's car will be less competitive than Tesla's. However, you do not specify what those features are or how they affect the performance or value of the cars. Additionally, you do not consider that some customers may prefer simpler and more reliable cars than complex and prone-to-glitch ones.
- You state that Apple's revenue slowed significantly last year as the company turned in multiple quarters of declining revenue growth. However, you do not provide any context or explanation for why this happened, such as market conditions, competition, or innovation gaps. Furthermore, you do not mention that Apple still generated billions of dollars in profit and cash flow, despite the lower revenue growth.
- You use quotation marks around "me-too product" to imply that Apple's EV is unoriginal and derivative. However, you do not support this claim with any evidence or argument, other than the vague reference to autonomous capabilities. Moreover, you do not acknowledge that many successful products in the market are based on adapting or improving existing ideas or technologies, rather than creating them from scratch.