Mark Zuckerberg, the boss of Facebook, reminded people that when Facebook first started, it was only for people who had a certain type of email address. This type of email address was only for students from special schools. But now, Facebook is for everyone! Read from source...

Mark Zuckerberg Reminds People That Facebook Was Far More Exclusive Once Than It Is Today, It Was Limited After All To People With A Certain Type Of Email Address — 'Real Ones Know'

1. Inconsistencies: The article states that Facebook was initially limited to people with a .edu email address, yet it fails to mention that this requirement was eventually lifted. It could have presented a more comprehensive view of Facebook's evolution.

2. Biases: The article seems to romanticize Facebook's exclusivity in its early days. By highlighting Zuckerberg's email address and referring to it as a "nostalgic" reminder, it may unintentionally stir up a sense of longing for a bygone era.

3. Irrational Arguments: The article suggests that Facebook's original policy of limiting membership to students from accredited institutions contributed to the site's exclusivity and appeal. However, this argument may not hold up to scrutiny, as there were likely other factors that contributed to Facebook's popularity.

4. Emotional Behavior: The article appears to evoke a sense of nostalgia among readers by reminding them of Facebook's early days. This emotional tone may not be entirely appropriate for a news article, as it could potentially cloud readers' judgment.

Overall, the article would benefit from a more balanced and objective perspective. By presenting a more comprehensive view of Facebook's evolution and avoiding emotional language, it could provide a more accurate and informative account of the platform's history.

The sentiment of the article is neutral. The article is just discussing a fact about Facebook's early days and how it has evolved over time. There are no strong positive or negative emotions attached to the information being presented.