A man named Jim Cramer gave his opinions on some companies that people can buy or sell stocks in. He thought these companies were good to invest in before, but now he changed his mind and thinks they are not so good anymore. He is not the only one who thinks this way, some other people also changed their opinions on these companies and now they think they are not worth as much money as before. These companies are Lululemon, Intel, Atlassian, and some others. Jim Cramer and other people like to help others make decisions about what to do with their money, and they sometimes change their minds about what is a good idea. Read from source...

- The article is about downgrades for Friday, but it only mentions one downgrade (Lululemon) and the rest are analysts' changes of opinion.
- The title is misleading and not accurate, it should be something like "Top 5 Analyst Downgrades For Friday" or "Top 5 Analysts Change Opinion On These Stocks".
- The article does not provide any reasoning or analysis behind the downgrades or changes of opinion, it just lists the names of the companies and the analysts involved.
- The article does not mention any potential reasons for the downgrades or changes of opinion, such as earnings, valuation, competition, macroeconomic factors, etc.
- The article does not provide any context or background information on the companies or the analysts, such as their performance, track record, ratings, etc.
- The article does not provide any comparison or contrast between the different downgrades or changes of opinion, such as the magnitude, the timeliness, the direction, etc.
- The article does not provide any alternative viewpoints or opinions from other analysts or sources, such as buy-side or sell-side, technical or fundamental, bullish or bearish, etc.
- The article does not provide any historical or statistical data or trends on the companies or the analysts, such as price movement, earnings growth, valuation ratios, etc.
- The article does not provide any guidance or recommendations for investors or traders, such as how to react, hedge, or trade based on the downgrades or changes of opinion.
- The article does not provide any disclaimers or disclosures, such as the relationship between Benzinga and the analysts, the compensation or incentives for the analysts, the potential conflicts of interest, etc.

Overall, the article is poorly written, uninformative, and unhelpful for investors or traders who are looking for insights and analysis on the downgrades or changes of opinion. It lacks credibility, objectivity, and professionalism.