An important person at Intel, named Lip- Bu Tan, decided to leave Intel's board. He said he needs to focus on other things. This happened after Intel didn't make as much money as people thought they would. They plan to spend $10 billion to fix this problem, but some people don't think it's enough. Read from source...

the whole gamut of what makes a bad article. Here, the story mentions 'Intel Board Member Lip- Bu Tan Resigns Amid Chipmaker's Struggle with Cost Cuts,' an article released by Benzinga.

The article has several issues starting with an underwhelming headline. A more appropriate headline could have been, 'Intel Board Member Quits Amid Financial Struggle.' This headline is more straightforward and accurately captures the main point of the article. It lacks the clarity and could be misleading to some readers.

The story also presents a lack of focus on important details. For instance, Lip-Bu Tan's resignation from Intel's board is attributed to personal reasons, but the article fails to delve deeper into this decision. It's unusual for a board member to resign citing personal reasons. The article doesn't present a comprehensive analysis of the decision, causing the reader to feel left out.

The article also has issues with balance and impartiality. It presents only one side of the story, focusing exclusively on Intel's financial struggles. The article fails to explore other potential factors that could have contributed to Tan's resignation, thereby giving the impression that the company's financial issues are the only reason for his departure.

Additionally, the article makes several statements that can be taken at face value due to the lack of any form of evidence or references. Assertions are made without providing any substantiating evidence or proof. This is a hallmark of poor journalism, as it deprives the reader of the ability to make an informed decision.

The article also suffers from a poor structure. It has no clear introductory paragraph or thesis statement, which could provide readers with an overview of the article's main points. The absence of a well-defined structure makes it challenging for readers to follow the narrative and understand the key points of the story.

The choice of language and tone of the article are also problematic. The article uses ambiguous language and terms that may be unfamiliar to the average reader. This lack of clarity could create confusion, leading to the misinterpretation of the information presented.

In conclusion, the article 'Intel Board Member Lip- Bu Tan Resigns Amid Chipmaker's Struggle with Cost Cuts' by Benzinga is a poorly constructed article that lacks clarity, objectivity, balance, and evidence-based reporting. It presents a one-sided narrative that could give the impression of manipulation to some readers, while leaving others in the dark.

Negative

The article discusses the resignation of Intel board member Lip- Bu Tan citing personal reasons. Furthermore, Intel's Q2 revenue missed estimates, and the company is planning $10B cost cuts. Analysts, however, doubt the turnaround. This news triggers a negative sentiment as it indicates challenges and uncertainties for the company.