**Big news, little ones!**

Game company Epic Games from "Fortnite" is making some big changes. They want to let you play games on your phone in a new way.

Right now, when you buy apps or games on your phone, you usually have to do it through the app store that comes with your phone. But Epic Games wants to change that. They're making their own app store for phones where you can get nearly 20 cool games!

And here's something super exciting: some of these games will be free! Yes, you heard it right, **F-R-E-E**! No money needed.

Now, you might be wondering why this is a big deal. Well, Epic Games is having a bit of a fight with two other big companies called Apple and Google because they don't think it's fair that everyone has to use just their app stores.

Epic Games thinks it would be better if we could choose where to get our apps from, just like when you go to the toy store and pick your favorite toys from lots of different shelves. So, they're trying to make this new app store happen.

This is all quite complicated for grown-ups too! But don't worry about that right now. Just remember, Fortnite's parent company wants to bring us more games and let us try some for free! Isn't that awesome? Read from source...

**AI's Article Story Critics:**

1. **Lack of Counterarguments:** The article presents Epic Games' perspective as fact without adequately addressing counterarguments from Apple and Google. It's important to hear both sides of the story to provide a balanced view.

2. **Assumption of Monopolistic Practices:** The article assumes that the app store restrictions implemented by major tech companies are monopolistic practices without providing concrete evidence or examples. Epic Games' perspective on this is discussed, but other interpretations should also be explored.

3. **Emotional Language:** Phrases like "pushed for a more open and competitive app store environment" and "challenging what it perceives as monopolistic practices" lean into emotional language that might not be purely factual. It's crucial to maintain an objective tone in reporting such matters.

4. **Inconsistent Tense Use:** The article switches between past, present, and future tense inconsistently when describing ongoing legal battles and Epic Games' plans for the future. This could make the timeline of events confusing for readers.

5. **Minimal Mention of Beneficiaries and Consequences:** While the article discusses Epic Games' perspective and the legal struggle, it does not delve into the potential beneficiaries of a more open app store ecosystem nor explore the possible consequences if Epic Games succeeds—both positive and negative aspects should be considered.

6. **Lack of Expert Opinions:** Apart from Tim Sweeney's quotes, the article could benefit from including opinions and analyses from other industry experts or analysts who might provide different insight and additional context to the situation.

7. **Bias Towards Drama:** The article seems to focus more on the dramatic aspects (i.e., the long-standing legal battle) rather than delving deep into the technical and economic aspects that led to these disputes in the first place. A more detailed explanation of the root causes could help readers better understand the current state of affairs.

8. **Repetition of Unsubstantiated Claims:** The article repeats phrases like "monopolistic practices" without providing substantial evidence or clarifying what specific practices Epic Games considers monopolistic and how they negatively impact the market.

Based on the article "Epic Games Expands Mobile Store, Launches Free Games Program: To Cover iOS Developer Fees", here's a sentiment analysis:

1. **Benzinga**:
- "In a significant move" (Positive)
- "amid a prolonged legal battle" (Neutral/ slightly Negative)
- "Epic’s financial stability was reaffirmed by Sweeney" (Positive)

2. **Epic Games**:
- "expands its mobile game store" (Positive)
- "hopeful that the European Commission will scrutinize Apple’s adherence to the DMA" (Neutral/ slightly Positive)
- "ready to continue this fight for decades if necessary" (Positive, showing determination)

3. **Apple and Google**:
- "encountered obstacles in the U.S." (Negative, referring to Epic's legal battles)
- "tension between Epic and major tech companies over app store restrictions" (Neutral/ slightly Negative)

Considering these factors, the overall sentiment of the article is mostly **Positive**, with a slight Neutral shade due to mentioning ongoing legal issues. However, it's important to note that the tone is generally optimistic about Epic Games' expansion and determination in challenging perceived monopolistic practices.