A big company called Microsoft has made some changes in who is in charge of important parts of their work. They have put a new person, Pavan Davuluri, in charge of the Windows and Surface teams. This means he will help make computers and tablets better. Another person, Panos Panay, left Microsoft to go work for Amazon because he was not happy with some changes at Microsoft. Now we are going to tell you what is happening in simple words, like how you would explain something to a 7-year-old kid. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalized. It suggests that Pavan Davuluri was promoted as the new boss of Windows and Surface teams, but in reality, he was only transferred from one role to another within Microsoft. He did not get a promotion or an increase in authority over the Windows and Surface divisions.
- The article fails to mention that Panos Panay left Microsoft for Amazon last year, which is a significant piece of information that contextualizes the current reorganization and Pavan's transfer. It also implies that Panay's departure was somehow related to Davuluri's promotion, which is not supported by any evidence or logic.
- The article uses vague terms like "reuniting", "bringing together", and "holistic approach" without explaining what they mean or how they affect the Windows and Surface teams. It also does not provide any details on the new E+D division, its goals, or its structure. This makes the article confusing and unclear for the readers who want to understand the implications of these changes for Microsoft's products and services.
- The article mentions Mustafa Suleyman's appointment as the CEO of a new AI team at Microsoft, but does not explain how this is relevant or connected to the reorganization or Pavan Davuluri's transfer. It also does not provide any information on what this new AI team will do or how it will impact Microsoft's current and future projects. This makes the article seem like a collection of unrelated facts that are thrown together without any coherence or purpose.
- The article uses emotional language and phrases such as "significant loss", "disheartened", "budget reductions", and "cancellation of products" to describe Panos Panay's exit from Microsoft. These words suggest that Panay was unhappy, mistreated, or pressured to leave by Microsoft, which may not be true or factual. They also imply a negative tone and attitude towards Microsoft as a company, without providing any balanced or objective perspective on the reasons behind Panay's departure or the reorganization.