A company called Illumina had some unusual activity with its stock options on May 07. Stock options are like bets people make on whether a company's stock price will go up or down. On that day, some big investors made 8 different bets about Illumina's future stock price. Most of them thought the price would go down, while only a few thought it would go up. They were willing to spend a lot of money on these bets. The possible prices they were interested in ranged from $110 to $150 per share. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalized: "Unusual Options Activity For May 07". This implies that something unusual or noteworthy happened on this specific date, when in fact the article does not provide any evidence for such a claim. It seems like an attempt to catch the reader's attention without providing any substantial information.
2. The article lacks clarity and coherence: The first paragraph starts by saying "we don't know" why there was unusual options activity, but then proceeds to make assumptions about what it might mean ("it often means somebody knows something is about to happen"). This is a logical fallacy known as argument from ignorance, which assumes that the lack of evidence for one hypothesis implies evidence for another.
3. The article presents irrelevant and confusing data: The percentage splits between bullish and bearish sentiment are given without any context or explanation of how they were measured or what they mean for the stock price. The mention of projected price targets is also vague and unclear, as it does not specify which options contracts or traders these numbers are based on.
4. The article uses emotional language and exaggeration: The phrase "this isn't normal" suggests that unusual options activity is a rare and alarming event, when in fact it is quite common and often indicative of nothing significant. The use of words like "big", "split", and "eyeing" also imply a sense of urgency and importance, which may not be justified by the actual data.
5. The article fails to provide any concrete or actionable information: The main purpose of such an article should be to inform readers about potential opportunities or risks in the stock market, but this article does not offer any clear guidance or recommendations based on the options activity. It only raises questions and speculation without providing any answers or solutions.

The sentiment analysis for this article is bearish.

To provide comprehensive investment recommendations from the article titled `Illumina Unusual Options Activity For May 07`, I will first analyze the key information provided by the article and then generate a list of possible actions for potential investors based on their risk appetite and desired returns. I will also include the risks associated with each action to help investors make an informed decision.