The new rules are about how cars and trucks can make less pollution, which is good for the environment and our health. They want more electric cars to be made because they don't produce as much pollution. The people who made these rules think that car makers should have different ways to make their vehicles cleaner. Some people like this idea, but others don't. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and exaggerated. Biden's green move is not bold or relaxed, but rather a cautious and ambitious attempt to balance environmental goals with economic and social factors. Relaxed implies that the standards are less strict than before, which is not true for all aspects of the rule.
- The article uses vague and unclear terms such as "yet" and "as well as". These words suggest a contrast or addition between relaxed and ambitious standards, or between greenhouse gas emissions and other air pollutants, but do not provide any evidence or explanation for these claims.
- The article relies on numbers and statistics provided by the EPA, without questioning their validity, source, or methodology. This creates a sense of authority and credibility for the EPA's rule, while ignoring potential alternative perspectives or criticisms from other stakeholders or experts.
- The article focuses on the benefits of the new standards for the environment, public health, and economy, without acknowledging any possible costs or drawbacks. This creates a one-sided and biased view of the issue, which may alienate some readers who have different opinions or concerns about the rule.
- The article mentions that the auto industry had previously cited lower sales growth as a reason to oppose the EPA's preferred standards, but does not explain why this is relevant or how it affects the new rules. This leaves a gap in the reader's understanding of the context and motivation behind the industry's opposition.
- The article states that transportation accounts for the largest source of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, without providing any evidence or citation for this claim. This makes it seem like an uncontested fact, rather than a debatable issue that may have different sources and measures.