Weed in Finland is not allowed. It's against the law and people can get in trouble if they use it. The government thinks weed is bad and AIgerous, so they don't let anyone have it or use it. If someone has a very small amount of weed, like less than 10 grams of hash or 15 grams of flowers, they might just have to pay some money, but they still broke the law. It's better not to take any chances and avoid using weed in Finland. Read from source...

- The article does not provide any historical or cultural context for why Finland has such a harsh stance on cannabis, which could explain the current situation better. It seems to assume that the readers are already familiar with the reasons behind the ban, rather than informing them. This is a poor writing technique that fails to engage the audience and foster understanding.
- The article uses vague terms such as "dangerous drug" and "threat to the public" without providing any evidence or statistics to back them up. These are subjective claims that could be challenged by different sources, but the author does not bother to cite any reliable research or data. This makes the article sound more like an opinion piece than a factual report.
- The article implies that Finland is not a very welcoming place for marijuana smokers, without acknowledging that this may depend on one's personal views and preferences. Some visitors may actually enjoy the culture and scenery of Finland without resorting to cannabis use, while others may find it oppressive and restrictive. The author does not consider the diversity of perspectives and experiences that travelers may have, which could make the article more inclusive and relevant.
- The article advises visitors to stay clear of cannabis use for the whole duration of their stay, without explaining why this is necessary or beneficial. It also fails to mention any alternatives or options that travelers may have if they want to explore the medical or recreational benefits of cannabis in a legal and safe way. The author does not seem to be aware of the growing trend of cannabis tourism, which could offer some valuable insights and recommendations for the readers.
- The article focuses mainly on the risks and consequences of violating the law, without providing any information about the current situation or future prospects of cannabis legalization in Finland. It also does not address any of the social, economic, medical, or environmental benefits that cannabis could bring to the country, such as reducing alcohol abuse, improving health outcomes, creating jobs, or protecting the environment. The author does not seem to have a balanced or comprehensive view of the topic, which limits the scope and quality of the article.

Negative

Summary:
The article discusses the legal status of cannabis in Finland and how it remains illegal for recreational use. It also highlights the risks and consequences of not following the law regarding cannabis possession and use in the country. The sentiment of this article is negative, as it portrays a unfavorable view of cannabis use in Finland and emphasizes the potential penalties and AIgers associated with it.