Sure, let me explain in a simple way!

Right now, Rigetti Computing is a company that's doing really well today. Their stock price went up by $1.20 from yesterday! This means more people wanted to buy the company's stock because they think it will do even better in the future.

The number of trades for their stocks also increased to 73 million, which is like having a lot of kids in a playground, all excited and playing together.

Some smart investors might be buying stocks of Rigetti Computing using something called "options". It's like choosing when you want to go on a fun trip (like Disneyland!) at the same price as today, even if it goes up later. If the stock price goes down instead, they'll still get to go on the trip at the lower price.

But don't worry about all that too much! What's important is that Rigetti Computing had a good day today, and people are interested in their company! Read from source...

Based on the provided text, here are some aspects that could be criticized or improved from a journalistic perspective:

1. **Objectivity and Bias:**
- The piece begins with an emphasis on the stock price increase, but it doesn't provide context for why this might be happening (e.g., company performance, market trends). This could give the impression of cheerleading rather than objective reporting.
- There's no mention of any potential downsides or risks associated with investing in Rigetti Computing.

2. **Accuracy and Clarity:**
- The text repeatedly mentions analyst ratings, but it doesn't provide specific details about what these ratings are (e.g., buy, sell, hold) or from which analysts they come.
- The phrase "Click to see more Options updates" is not clear; it would be better to specify what exact information the reader will find by clicking.

3. **Structure and Coherence:**
- The order of information seems disjointed. Starting with analyst ratings, then moving on to a brief mention of earnings, options activity, and ending with calls to action (Joining Benzinga) could be more coherent if structured around a storyline or key theme.
- Some headings ("Earnings", "Analyst Ratings", "Options", "Dividends") don't provide clear information about the actual content underneath them.

4. **Missing Context:**
- There's no historical context for Rigetti Computing's stock price performance, making it difficult to understand whether today's increase is typical or unusual.
- The text doesn't explain what options activity means, who engages in this behavior, or why it might be relevant to readers.

5. **Emotional Appeal and Hype:**
- Phrases like "Rigetti Computing Inc.$13.88+1.20%" could be seen as attempting to evoke a sense of urgency or excitement, which may not align with best journalistic practices.
- The repetitive use of "Click to" throughout the text has a promotional feel and may distract from the informational content.

6. **Lack of Expert Insight:**
- The article would benefit from quotes or insights from industry experts, analysts, or Rigetti Computing's representatives to provide deeper analysis and perspective.

In conclusion, while this text provides some information about Rigetti Computing, it could be improved by incorporating more context, balance, accuracy, and expert insight.

Based on the information provided in the article, here's a breakdown of the sentiment:

- **Positive**:
- The stock price has increased by 1.20%.
- There is only one analyst rating mentioned, which is 'Buy' from an unnamed analyst.

- **Neutral**:
- No explicit concerns or negative aspects are mentioned about the company or its stocks.
- No significant news or events have been highlighted that would cause a dramatic change in sentiment.

- **Negative/ Bearish**: None

Overall, the article presents a neutral to slightly positive sentiment towards Rigetti Computing Inc due to the stock price increase and the Buy rating from an analyst. However, it's important to consider other factors and multiple sources of information when making investment decisions.

Here's the final rating: **Neutral - Slightly Positive**