A big company called Charles Schwab (SCHW) is being watched by some very rich people who can buy or sell a lot of it. They are trying to guess if the price will go up or down, so they are making special bets called options. Some of them think the price will go down and bought something called "puts" which lets them sell SCHW at a certain price. Others think the price will go up and bought something called "calls" which lets them buy SCHW at a certain price. These big investors are watching to see what happens with SCHW's price in the next few months, and they have different ideas about where it might be. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading as it suggests that whales are doing something unusual or noteworthy with SCHW, when in reality, the article does not provide any evidence of such activity. It merely reports on some options trades made by financial giants, which could be part of their regular strategy and not necessarily indicative of a specific view on SCHW.
2. The article uses vague terms like "unusual trades" and "bearish move" without defining what constitutes as such. This creates confusion and uncertainty for the reader, who may wonder how these trades are different from usual or normal ones, and why they imply a bearish outlook on SCHW.
3. The article fails to provide any context or background information about Charles Schwab, its industry, competitors, market position, etc. This makes it difficult for the reader to understand the significance of the options trades and how they may affect SCHW's performance or prospects.
4. The article does not explain how the price territory stretching from $57.5 to $80.0 was derived or what it implies for investors. It also does not mention any time frame or source of this information, which raises questions about its accuracy and reliability.
5. The article ends abruptly with a sentence that seems unrelated to the rest of the content. It introduces the concepts of volume and open interest, but does not explain how they are relevant to stock research or SCHW's situation. It also does not provide any data or examples to support its claims.