Whales are people with lots of money who buy or sell stocks in big companies, like Walmart. They looked at Walmart's situation and decided to buy more stocks because they think the price will go up. This is called a bullish stance. Some whales also sold stocks because they think the price will go down, which is called a bearish stance. But most of them bought stocks. They used something called options to do this, which are like bets on how much a stock will change in price. The whales who bought options hope Walmart's price will rise and they can sell their options for more money than they paid. The whales who sold options hope Walmart's price will fall and they can buy the options back for less money than they got from selling them. Most of these big trades happened between $51.67 and $70.0 per share, which is a range of possible prices that the whales think Walmart might reach in the next few months. Read from source...

1. The article title is misleading and sensationalized. It suggests that whales are doing something unusual or important with WMT, but does not provide any evidence or explanation for why this matters to ordinary investors. A more accurate title could be "Some Whales Open Bullish or Bearish Trades on Walmart Options".
2. The article body does not provide any context or background information about the options market, the term whale, or the significance of the price band mentioned. It assumes that readers already know these concepts and their implications, which may confuse or alienate some readers who are new to options trading or Walmart as a company.
3. The article relies heavily on numbers and data without explaining how they were obtained, what they mean, or why they matter. For example, it states that 60% of investors opened trades with bullish expectations and 40% with bearish, but does not specify the source or time frame of this information, nor does it compare it to any benchmarks or averages. It also does not explain how the price target was derived, or what factors influence the volume and open interest of Walmart options.
4. The article uses vague and ambiguous terms such as "major market movers" and "focusing on a price band". These phrases do not convey any clear or actionable information to readers, and may create more confusion than clarity. A better approach would be to name specific firms, strategies, or indicators that are driving the options activity, and explain how they relate to Walmart's performance, fundamentals, or valuation.