Some people at a company called OpenAI didn't like their boss, Sam Altman, because they thought he was not nice. They talked to other important people in the company and convinced them to make him leave. Then, they felt bad and wanted him to come back, but it was too late. He went to work for another big company called Microsoft. The people at OpenAI were sad and angry about what happened, and some of them left the company too. Read from source...

- The article focuses on the drama and conflicts within OpenAI, rather than the scientific and technical achievements of the organization.
- The article uses vague terms like "manipulation", "palace coup" without providing clear evidence or definitions, creating confusion and sensationalism.
- The article fails to mention that Murati and Sutskever publicly supported Altman's reinstatement, which contradicts the claim of their strong criticism of his leadership.
- The article ignores the fact that Microsoft Corp. is OpenAI's biggest investor and partner, and that Altman and Brockman were quickly hired by them to lead a new AI research team, indicating their high value and expertise in the field.
- The article exaggerates the impact of the staff rebellion on OpenAI's stability, without considering other factors such as the board's decision, the investors' support, or the legal implications of Altman's departure from OpenAI.

Negative

Summary:
OpenAI's former president Sam Altman was ousted from the company due to leadership issues. Key executives Mira Murati and Ilya Sutskever raised concerns about his manipulation and questioned his ability to lead the company. This led to a staff rebellion, with most employees demanding Altman's reinstatement and the board's resignation. The situation highlighted the challenges of governance and accountability in AI companies.