Oracle is a big company that helps other companies with their computer stuff. They work with another company called Nvidia, which makes special chips for computers. Together, they want to make better and smarter computers using something called AI. This is important because it can change the way we use computers in many ways. Oracle had a good quarter, making more money than before, but not as much as some people thought they would. They got more money from their cloud services, which are like online computer stuff that you can use over the internet. Read from source...

- The title is catchy and sensationalist, but it does not convey a clear or accurate message about the content of the article. It suggests that Oracle is on some kind of high or euphoria, which is misleading and exaggerated. A better title could be something like "Oracle Partners with Nvidia to Advance AI Solutions" or "How Oracle and Nvidia are Joining Forces in the AI Revolution".
- The article starts by mentioning a joint announcement with Nvidia, but then does not provide any details or context about what it entails. This creates confusion and suspense for the reader, who might expect to learn more about the collaboration, but is left hanging until the next week. A better approach would be to give a brief overview of the partnership and its potential impact on the market, then proceed with the financial results and highlights of the quarter.
- The article does not explain why Oracle's revenue rose 7% YoY or how it compares to the industry average or competitors. This is important information for investors and readers who want to understand Oracle's performance and growth prospects. A comparison with other tech giants like Amazon, Microsoft, Google, or IBM would be helpful in showing Oracle's relative strength or weakness in the cloud services market.
- The article mentions that generative AI boosted infrastructure revenue, but does not elaborate on what it means or how it works. Generative AI is a broad and complex topic that requires some explanation and examples to make it accessible and relevant for the audience. How does Oracle use generative AI in its cloud services? What are some of the benefits and challenges of using it? How does it differ from other forms of AI, such as machine learning or deep learning?
- The article ends with a vague statement about large new cloud infrastructure contracts and total remaining performance obligations. This is another area where more details and clarification would be appreciated by the readers. What are these contracts and obligations? How much revenue do they generate or represent? Which customers or segments are involved? How does this affect Oracle's future outlook and strategy?

Overall, the article seems to lack depth, accuracy, and coherence in its presentation of Oracle's financial results and AI initiatives. It relies too much on hype and speculation, rather than facts and evidence. The writing style is also somewhat informal and casual, which does not convey a professional or credible tone. The article could benefit from more research, analysis, and editing to improve its quality and value for the readers.