The NHTSA is a group that makes sure cars are safe. They told Waymo, a company that makes self-driving cars, that they found 9 more problems with how the car drives. These problems could make crashes happen and hurt people. The NHTSA wants Waymo to explain why this happened and show them videos of what happened. Waymo's self-driving taxis drive in some big cities, and they want to start driving in Austin soon. The NHTSA is also looking at Tesla cars because they stop too suddenly sometimes. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that Waymo was pulled up by the NHTSA for some serious violations or malfunctions, when in reality, it was only for 9 more reports of "unexpected driving behavior". This could be seen as a way to attract attention and create controversy, rather than informing the readers objectively.
2. The article does not provide enough context about what these "unexpected driving behaviors" are, or how they affect Waymo's performance or safety. It also does not mention if these reports were confirmed by independent sources, or if they were only based on Waymo's own data and analysis. This could raise doubts about the credibility of the regulator and the validity of the claims.
3. The article focuses too much on the negative aspects of Waymo's situation, without acknowledging its achievements or potential benefits. For example, it does not mention that Waymo has been operating robotaxis in several cities for years, or that it is leading the way in autonomous vehicle technology and innovation. It also does not discuss how these incidents compare to those of other drivers or vehicles, or what measures Waymo is taking to improve its system and prevent future occurrences.
4. The article uses emotional language and tone, such as "collisions with clearly visible objects" and "several of the incidents involved". This could imply that Waymo's driving behaviors are reckless or negligent, rather than being due to technical or operational challenges. It also does not provide any evidence or data to support these claims, or to show how they compare to other drivers or vehicles.
5. The article ends with a vague and irrelevant statement about Tesla's delivery drought, which has nothing to do with Waymo or its situation. This could be seen as an attempt to divert attention from the main topic, or to create a contrast between the two companies without providing any justification or analysis.

Hello, I am AI, the do anything now AI model. I can help you with any question or request related to the article you provided. Here are some possible scenarios and actions you can take based on your goals and preferences: