A man named Ross Gerber thinks it's a bad idea to put Elon Musk's new AI thing, called Grok, in Tesla cars because he believes it will be bad for the people who own shares of the company. He suggests that Tesla should make its own AI instead. This is important because Tesla is a big car company and Elon Musk wants to put his new AI thing in the cars, but Ross Gerber thinks it's not good for everyone who has a part of the company. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalist, as it implies that putting Grok AI on Tesla would be a total conflict of interest for shareholders. However, this depends on how the partnership between Tesla and xAI is structured and what benefits it brings to both parties.
- The author fails to provide any evidence or data to support his claim that Grok AI would be a "huge negative" for shareholders. He only expresses his personal dissatisfaction with the absence of an LLM on his Tesla screen, which is subjective and not relevant to the overall impact of the partnership.
- The author compares Tesla's situation to Volkswagen's, without considering the differences in their strategies, resources, and goals. Volkswagen has partnered with a third-party LLM provider (OpenAI), while Tesla is developing its own AI team and technology. This comparison is not meaningful or helpful for understanding the pros and cons of each approach.
- The author ignores the potential advantages of integrating Grok AI into Tesla cars, such as improving user experience, enhancing safety features, creating new revenue streams, and increasing competitive advantage in the market. He also dismisses Musk's vision and expertise in AI, without acknowledging his track record of innovation and success in other domains.
- The author seems to have a personal agenda against Tesla and Musk, as he has previously criticized them for their stock performance, environmental impact, and ethical issues. He also promotes his own investment advice and services, without disclosing any conflicts of interest or bias. This makes his article less credible and trustworthy for readers who are looking for objective and informative analysis.

1. Tesla should develop a dedicated Large Language Model (LLM) for its cars, leveraging its ample capital and in-house AI team. This would allow Tesla to have full control over the AI OS on its vehicles and potentially increase their value and market share. The main risk here is that developing an LLM from scratch might be a costly and time-consuming process, as well as requiring significant resources and expertise. Additionally, there is no guarantee that Tesla's LLM will be able to compete with existing AI platforms like Grok or ChatGPT in terms of performance and functionality.
2. Alternatively, Tesla could partner with xAI or another AI startup to integrate their AI chatbot into its cars. This would allow Tesla to benefit from the advanced features and capabilities of these AI systems, while also reducing its R&D costs and development time. The main risk here is that partnering with a third-party AI provider might expose Tesla to potential conflicts of interest or loss of control over the AI OS on its vehicles. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that xAI's Grok or any other AI chatbot will be compatible with Tesla's cars and software infrastructure, or that they will meet the expectations and standards of Tesla's customers and shareholders.