So, this article is about Bitcoin, a type of digital money that people can buy and sell. It has gone up in value by more than 3% in the last 24 hours, which means people are willing to pay more for it now than they were before. This might make people who own Bitcoin happy because their digital money is worth more now. The article also talks about how much Bitcoin there is and how much it is worth compared to other things. Read from source...

1. The article title is misleading and sensationalized, implying that Bitcoin has risen more than 3% in 24 hours, when in fact it has risen by exactly 3.6%. This is a minor difference, but it shows a lack of accuracy and attention to detail.
2. The article does not provide any context or background information about Bitcoin, its history, or its potential future prospects. This makes it difficult for readers who are not familiar with cryptocurrency to understand the significance of the price increase.
3. The article uses outdated and irrelevant information, such as the all-time high of $73,738.00, which was reached in November 2020. This information is no longer meaningful or relevant to the current market situation, and it may confuse readers who are trying to gauge the current state of the cryptocurrency.
4. The article includes a chart that compares the price movement and volatility of Bitcoin over the past 24 hours and the past week, but it does not explain what the data means or why it is important. The gray bands on the chart represent Bollinger Bands, which are a technical analysis tool used to measure volatility, but the article does not explain this or provide any interpretation of the data.
5. The article cites a source, CoinGecko API, without providing any additional information or context about the company or its credibility. This makes it difficult for readers to evaluate the reliability and validity of the data presented in the article.
6. The article ends with a promotional message for Benzinga's automated content engine and its review process, which is irrelevant to the topic of the article and may undermine the credibility of the content.
7. The article contains several grammatical and punctuation errors, such as missing commas and improper use of quotation marks, which detract from the overall quality and professionalism of the writing.
8. The article does not provide any personal opinions or insights from the author or any experts, which makes it feel impersonal and lacking in depth. A more engaging and informative article would include some analysis, commentary, or predictions from knowledgeable sources in the cryptocurrency field.

The sentiment of this article is bullish. The article discusses the rise in Bitcoin's price over the past 24 hours and week, as well as its all-time high. It also provides various charts and data points that support the positive trend in the cryptocurrency's value.