Some people who have a lot of money (market whales) are buying options for a company called ON Semiconductor. This means they think the company's stock price will go up or down in the future. They are spending a lot of money on these options, so other people who follow the market might want to do the same. This could make the stock price move more because of the big buyers. Read from source...

- AI: Inconsistencies: The article is about "whales" and their options bets on ON Semiconductor, but it's unclear how they are defined as whales and what is their relation to the options transactions. The article also mentions options scanner and options data, but it's unclear how they are accessed or verified. The article also mentions options sentiment, but it does not explain how it is measured or interpreted.
- AI: Biases: The article seems to present ON Semiconductor in a positive light, highlighting its growth prospects, analyst ratings, and earnings release date. However, it does not mention any potential risks or challenges that the company may face, such as competition, regulatory changes, or market volatility. The article also seems to favor bearish options trades, as it uses words like "bearish", "neutral", and "put" more frequently than "bullish", "positive", and "call".
- AI: Irrational arguments: The article uses some vague and unsubstantiated claims, such as "such a major move in ON usually indicates foreknowledge of upcoming events", "the significant investors are aiming for a price territory stretching from $70.0 to $95.0", and "these large-scale traders should be aware of". The article does not provide any evidence or sources to support these claims, nor does it explain how they are relevant to the options transactions or the stock performance.
- AI: Emotional behavior: The article uses some emotional language, such as "retail traders should be aware of", "biggest options spotted", "market status", and "earnings". The article seems to appeal to emotions rather than logic, and it tries to create a sense of urgency and excitement among the readers. The article also seems to imply that the readers should follow or copy the options trades of the whales, without providing any reasons or analysis.

### Final answer: The article is poorly written and unreliable, as it contains inconsistencies, biases, irrational arguments, and emotional behavior. It does not provide any valuable information or insights about the options trades or the stock performance. It seems to be more of a promotional piece than a journalistic one.