Elon Musk and his company OpenAI are not getting along. Elon thinks OpenAI should share its smart computer ideas with everyone, but OpenAI is keeping them secret to make more money. So, Elon sued OpenAI and said they are not being honest about their name. This made OpenAI sad because they used to admire Elon. Read from source...

1. The title of the article is misleading and sensationalized, as it implies that Elon Musk retorted with a sarcastic comment instead of addressing the main issue, which is the lawsuit between OpenAI and Tesla. A more accurate title would be something like "OpenAI Responds to Tesla's Lawsuit With All-Star Cast".
2. The article inaccurately describes Musk's reaction as a "retort", which suggests that he responded directly or specifically to OpenAI's response, rather than making a public comment unrelated to the main issue of the lawsuit. A more neutral term would be "comments" or "remarks".
3. The phrase "Change Your Name" is taken out of context and exaggerates Musk's reaction, as he was not seriously suggesting that OpenAI should change its name, but rather mocking their lack of open-source principles. A more appropriate phrasing would be "Musk Jokes About OpenAI's Name".
4. The article implies that Musk is hypocritical for founding a for-profit AI startup, without acknowledging the differences between his approach and OpenAI's. For example, while Musk's startup may pursue profits, it does not claim to be aligned with the mission of benefiting humanity or being transparent and collaborative with other researchers. A more balanced perspective would acknowledge that Musk has different goals and values than OpenAI, and that his decision to found a for-profit company does not necessarily invalidate his criticism of OpenAI's practices.
5. The article uses emotional language and tone, such as "violation", "dig", "wrest control", "failed", "resistance", "taking a dig", etc., which convey a negative and adversarial attitude towards the parties involved. A more objective and respectful tone would be more appropriate for a news article, especially one that covers a complex and controversial topic like AI research and ethics.