Edward Snowden is a man who used to work for the US government, but he told secrets about what they were doing. He thinks Bitcoin is really good and can help people not have problems with money like when the NYSE trading place had a big glitch and made some important company's shares lose value. Warren Buffett is another man who has a lot of money, but he doesn't think Bitcoin is useful because it doesn't make anything or produce things like normal money does. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalized, implying that Snowden's comment was a direct response to the NYSE glitch or that it had a significant impact on Berkshire Hathaway shares. In reality, Snowden tweeted his opinion hours after the incident occurred, and there is no evidence of any connection between his comment and the market situation.
2. The article presents Coinbase's outage as a negative event for Bitcoin, while ignoring its potential benefits for other cryptocurrencies or platforms that could gain from the temporary disruption of the dominant player in the space.
3. The article contrasts Snowden's pro-cryptocurrency stance with Buffett's anti-Bitcoin views, without acknowledging the possibility of nuanced positions or different perspectives on cryptocurrencies other than Bitcoin. For example, Buffett has expressed skepticism about blockchain technology in general, not just Bitcoin.
4. The article quotes Snowden's statement that Bitcoin is the most significant monetary advancement since coinage, without providing any context or explanation for this claim. This could be seen as a biased or unsupported opinion from an individual who has a vested interest in promoting cryptocurrencies and undermining traditional financial systems.
5. The article mentions Buffett's quote about Bitcoin having no intrinsic value, without challenging or questioning this argument or providing any counterexamples or alternatives. This could be seen as an irrational or unsophisticated understanding of cryptocurrencies and their role in the modern economy.
6. The article ends with a promotional message for Benzinga's services, which is irrelevant to the topic of Snowden's comment and the NYSE glitch, and could be seen as an attempt to manipulate or influence the readers' opinions or behavior.

Neutral

Analysis: The article is mainly informative and presents different perspectives on Bitcoin from various individuals and entities. It does not convey a strong sentiment towards the cryptocurrency itself, but rather reports on its price action and some events that affect it. Edward Snowden's comment is supportive of Bitcoin, while Warren Buffett's view is more skeptical. The article also mentions Coinbase going down for a few hours, which could be seen as a negative factor for the crypto exchange, but not necessarily for Bitcoin itself. Overall, the article has a neutral tone and does not express a clear bias towards or against Bitian.