A big city that has many people working to make sure we have water, gas, and electricity, decided to use a new phone called Siyata SD7. This phone is cheaper than the old two-way radios they used before and it helps them do their jobs better by letting them talk easily with each other. The city chose this phone because it works on a special network that can help them when there are problems with important things like electricity or water. Read from source...

- The headline of the article is misleading and sensationalized, as it implies that Siyata Mobile was selected by a city-owned utility for its budget-friendly handsets to keep utilities running smoothly. However, the article does not provide any evidence or details about how the Siyata Mobile's products actually contributed to this goal, nor does it mention which city-owned utility is involved in the selection process.
- The article contains several promotional elements, such as a limited time deal offer for Benzinga Pro subscribers, an advertisement for FirstNet, and a link to sign up for data and APIs. These elements seem to be more focused on generating revenue for Benzinga than providing informative and unbiased content about Siyata Mobile's products and services.
- The article uses vague and exaggerated terms, such as "mission-critical", "ideal device choice", and "cost savings" without providing any concrete data or statistics to support these claims. For example, the article does not specify how much money the city will save by switching to Siyata Mobile's handsets, nor does it compare them with other alternatives in terms of performance, reliability, security, etc.
- The article relies heavily on quotes from Siyata Mobile's management and marketing materials, without questioning their validity or objectivity. For instance, the article cites a Total Cost of Ownership analysis conducted by the city, but does not reveal who did it, how it was done, what assumptions were made, or what results were obtained. The article also quotes Siyata Mobile's CEO saying that his company is "the leader in Push-to-Talk over Cellular solutions", without providing any evidence or references to back up this claim.
- The article fails to address any potential drawbacks or challenges of using Siyata Mobile's handsets, such as network coverage, signal quality, battery life, maintenance costs, user training, etc. It also does not mention any competitors or alternatives that might offer similar or better solutions for the city's Public Utilities department.