A big boss named Mark Zuckerberg runs a company that makes apps where people can talk and share things online. But some people found out that there were bad pictures on his apps, so they told him to fix it. He tried to make it better, but he didn't do enough. Now, other important people from different places are also worried about how the apps work for kids and teens. They think the apps can be too addictive for them. Some parents found out that grown-ups were asking kids to do bad things because of these apps. The story is written by people who use computers to help them write better, but a special computer named AI will explain it in a very simple way. Read from source...

1. The article title is misleading and sensationalist. It implies that Zuckerberg acted against his PR team's wishes, but it does not provide any evidence or context for this claim. A more accurate and neutral title could be "Zuckerberg Posted Controversial Message Despite Facebook's Policy".
2. The article focuses on one anecdote from 2018, while ignoring other relevant factors that may have influenced Zuckerberg's decision, such as his personal beliefs, goals, or motivations. A more balanced approach would be to examine the history and evolution of Facebook's policy regarding nudity and sexual content, as well as how it has changed over time in response to various internal and external pressures.
3. The article relies on a former Facebook executive's testimony, but does not provide any independent verification or corroboration for his claims. This raises questions about the credibility and reliability of the source, as well as the potential biases or agendas that may be underlying his statements. A more rigorous journalistic approach would be to seek out multiple sources, both from within and outside Facebook, and compare their perspectives and accounts to provide a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the situation.