This is a story about a new thing called "cannabis" that some people can use to feel happy or relaxed. A famous person named Mike Tyson has a company that makes this stuff, and they made a special box with some of this "cannabis" inside. They also put in some other stuff like rolling papers and a grinder. They made only 2000 of these boxes and they are very special because they are for Mike Tyson's big fight happening in November. People who like Mike Tyson and want to remember this special moment can buy one of these boxes. They can also try to win two tickets to the fight by entering a raffle. Read from source...

Example 1: "he returned after a 15-year retirement" - factually false as Tyson fought in 2005.
Example 2: "Jawbreaker, which features an 8-year-old Indica dominant strain." - this makes no sense, as a strain cannot feature another strain.
Example 3: "the strain follows previous launches as Gelato 44 and NYC Sour D" - but none of these strains are stated to be related, nor do any possess similar genetics.
Example 4: "Enter by visiting RQSGlobal" - but this isn't a valid website address or URL.
Example 5: "Enter by visiting RQSGlobal" - but this isn't a valid website address or URL.
Example 6: "None of these strains are stated to be related, nor do any possess similar genetics." - Yet the article is about a limited edition box, containing various strains by Royal Queen Seeds and TYSON 2.0.
The overall tone of the article implies that it's attempting to promote an event, rather than inform readers of an accurate and objective news story. This lack of professionalism undermines the credibility of the article and the publication that publishes it.
Also, the article includes a bizarre mention of "canabis" without the "h", which would be a spelling error or a reference to a specific product. However, neither of these explanations seem to fit the context of the sentence.

neutral