Sure, let's pretend you're a kid named Timmy.

You know how sometimes you can't see something clearly because it's too far away or very small? Like when you're trying to read the words on the back of a toy from across the room?

LIDAR is like a special pair of glasses that helps cars and robots "see" things much better, even in the dark or fog.

Instead of eyes, LIDAR uses laser beams. It sends out lots of tiny laser lights super quickly, and then waits to see how long it takes for them to bounce back after hitting something.

Based on how long it took, LIDAR can figure out where things are and how far away they are. This helps cars know when there's another car or a pedestrian nearby, so they can brake in time.

But Timmy, you might wonder why some people don't like using LIDAR all the time. It's because even though LIDAR is great at helping see obstacles, it also costs more and uses up more energy than other ways of sensing what's around us. That's why different kinds of cars use different technologies to help them drive safely.

So, in simple terms, LIDAR is like special laser glasses for cars that help them see better! Read from source...

Based on the provided text, here are some constructive criticism points from AI as a professional reader:

1. **Inconsistencies**:
- The article mentions that Benzinga provides market news and data through APIs, but it also includes a sign-up CTA for "Benzinga.com," which suggests they might have two separate platforms or there's inconsistency in messaging.
- The disclaimer states that Benzinga doesn't provide investment advice, yet the article encourages users to trade confidently with insights and alerts from analyst ratings.

2. **Biases**:
- AI perceives a bias towards promoting Benzinga's services throughout the article, which could compromise its objectivity as a news piece.
- The use of percentages ("Good62.5%","1000/100") to denote rating or analysis might be seen as vague and potentially misleading.

3. **Irrational arguments**:
- AI finds no irrational arguments in the provided text.

4. **Emotional behavior**:
- The tone of the article seems mostly neutral, focusing on information rather than evoking strong emotions.
- However, the use of all caps for "TRADE CONFIDENTLY" could be seen as overly aggressive or emotive, potentially leading users to make rushed decisions.

AI's suggestions to improve the text:
- Maintain consistencies in messaging and platform mention throughout the article.
- Ensure a balance between promoting services and presenting unbiased information.
- Consider using clear and specific values or percentages instead of vague ratings like "Good62.5%".
- Softening the tone for calls-to-action can make users feel more comfortable with their decisions.

Neutral. The article is informative and presents both sides of the argument regarding Elon Musk's views on lidar technology without explicitly endorsing or condemning either perspective.

Explanations:

1. **Elon Musk's views**: He believes lidar (Light Detection and Ranging) is not necessary for self-driving cars and has likened it to "an eye with a blind spot."

2. **Industry view**: Some experts argue that lidar provides crucial distance measurement data, especially in low-visibility conditions, making it a beneficial component for autonomous vehicles.

As the article sticks to presenting both sides fairly without any significant emotional language or strong expressions of opinion, its sentiment can be considered neutral.