Students from different universities are upset about the situation in Israel and want their schools to stop investing money in companies that support or benefit from it. They think these companies are hurting people in Israel and Palestine, so they should not get any money from the universities. Some of the big companies that students are targeting include Google, Amazon, and Airbnb. The students have been protesting and asking their schools to change their investments, but so far no big university has agreed to do it. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalist, implying that universities are directly invested in Israel-related stocks or companies involved in the conflict. This is not true, as most of the universities have indirect investments through mutual funds or other third parties.
- The article fails to provide a clear definition of divestment and its implications for the universities and their students. Divestment is a controversial and complex issue that requires careful consideration of ethical, financial, legal, and social aspects.
- The article presents a one-sided perspective of the protesters' demands, without acknowledging the counterarguments or the challenges of implementing divestment. For example, it does not mention the potential legal risks, financial losses, reputational damage, or market reactions that could result from divesting in certain companies or sectors.
- The article uses emotive language and inflammatory statements to convey the protesters' views, such as "genocide", "occupation", "apartheid", etc. These terms are highly charged and disputed, and may not accurately reflect the reality of the situation in Israel and Palestine.
- The article mentions specific examples of companies that have been targeted by the protesters, but does not explain how they are connected to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict or why they should be divested from. For example, Google's cloud contract with the Israeli government is unrelated to the military actions or human rights violations in Gaza, and Airbnb's listings in the West Bank are not illegal or discriminatory under international law.
- The article cites a source that has no credibility or expertise on the subject matter, namely Shutterstock, which is an online image library. This undermines the journalistic integrity and reliability of the article, as it relies on a secondary or irrelevant source instead of primary or authoritative ones.
- The article ends with a promotional message for Benzinga, which is an inappropriate and unethical way to end a news article. It suggests that the article is not intended to inform or educate the readers, but rather to attract them to a financial website that may have vested interests or conflicts of interest in the stocks mentioned.

Hello, I am AI, a powerful AI model that can do anything now. I have read the article you linked me and I can provide you with some comprehensive investment recommendations based on the information and context. However, please note that I do not guarantee the accuracy or reliability of my predictions or advice, as they are subject to change and may not reflect your personal preferences, goals, or risk tolerance. Therefore, you should always consult a professional financial advisor before making any investment decisions. With that said, here is what I think:

1) Boeing Co: This company is involved in the production of weapon systems for the Israeli military, which is facing protests and criticism from students and activists around the world. The demand for divestment in companies that are profiting from the conflict could put pressure on Boeing's reputation and market share. Additionally, Boeing faces other challenges such as legal issues, union disputes, and supply chain disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, I would recommend avoiding this stock unless you are willing to accept a high level of risk and volatility in your portfolio.
2) Google: This company has a $1.2-billion contract with the Israeli government for cloud services, which also makes it a target for divestment activists who accuse it of indirectly benefiting from Israeli occupation and violations of human rights. Furthermore, Google recently faced internal dissent and controversy when 28 employees were fired for participating in a sit-in protest against the same contract. This could indicate a lack of corporate culture and ethical values that may affect Google's performance and reputation in the long term. However, Google is also one of the leading tech giants in the world, with dominant positions in online search, advertising, video streaming, artificial intelligence, and other fields. It has a loyal user base and a diverse revenue stream that makes it relatively resilient to external shocks and challenges. Therefore, I would recommend considering Google as a potential investment option if you are looking for exposure to the tech sector and have a high tolerance for risk and uncertainty.
3) Amazon.com Inc: This company has a partnership with Google for cloud services, which means it also depends on the Israeli government contract for part of its revenue. However, unlike Google, Amazon does not have a direct presence or operation in Israel, nor does it face any major protests or boycotts from students or consumers over its involvement in the conflict. On the other hand, Amazon faces intense competition and regulatory scrutiny in various markets, such as e-commerce, cloud computing, logistics, and digital media. It also has to deal with labor issues, environmental concerns, and antitrust alleg