A person who knows a lot about businesses (CEO) bought some more pieces of a company that he already owns (Presidio Property Trust). Another important person in another company (Director) also bought more pieces of his company (GEE Group). These companies are not doing very well right now, but the people who run them think they will do better later. Read from source...

1. The title of the article is misleading and does not reflect the content well. It implies that insiders are buying three stocks under $3, but only two of them are actually mentioned in the article body. This creates a false impression of value and urgency for readers who may be interested in the third stock.
2. The article is poorly structured and lacks coherence. It jumps from one topic to another without providing clear transitions or explanations. For example, it introduces Presidio Property Trust's net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2024, but does not explain how this relates to insiders buying the stock or why it is relevant information for readers.
3. The article uses vague and ambiguous terms such as "insider" without defining who they are or what their role is in the company. This makes it difficult for readers to understand the significance of their actions and whether they have any influence on the stock's performance. Additionally, the article does not provide any context for why these insiders are buying the stocks, such as their background, expertise, or motives.
4. The article contains factual errors and inconsistencies. For example, it states that Presidio Property Trust is an internally managed REIT with holdings in model home properties, but then contradicts itself by saying that it also has office, industrial, and retail properties. This creates confusion for readers who may be trying to understand the company's business model and portfolio.
5. The article uses emotional language and appeals to fear or greed to persuade readers to buy the stocks. For example, it says that "you may never see this price again" and "power pro users to win more", which are both exaggerated claims that do not reflect reality. This type of writing is unprofessional and manipulative, and does not provide useful information for investors who want to make informed decisions based on facts and analysis.