So, Elon Musk said that making a robot called Optimus costs less than half of what it takes to make a car. He was talking about how difficult and complex the robot is compared to a car. But he believes that even with all those challenges, making the robot will still be cheaper than making a car. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and clickbait-ish. It implies that Elon Musk claims Optimus will be more valuable than Tesla EV, which he did not say explicitly. He said it would cost half as much to make, but not necessarily that it would be worth more or that it would be the most valuable product ever.
2. The article uses vague and uncertain terms such as "potential", "good chance", "impossible to make a precise prediction". These words suggest a lack of confidence in Tesla's ability to deliver on its promises, while also implying that there is some hidden potential that makes Optimus a game-changer.
3. The article cites ARK Invest's director of research as an expert source, but does not mention any other sources or counterarguments. This creates a one-sided and biased presentation of the issue, without acknowledging the possible challenges or limitations that Tesla may face in developing Optimus.
4. The article mentions Tesla's introduction of Optimus in 2021, but does not provide any updates or progress reports on how the project is going. This makes the reader wonder if Optimus is still a relevant and active initiative, or if it has been abandoned or postponed.
5. The article quotes Musk's statement that Optimus can handle "unsafe, repetitive, or tedious tasks". However, this does not explain how Optimus will differentiate itself from existing robots or automation systems that already perform these tasks. What unique features or capabilities will Optimus have? How will it adapt to different environments and situations? These questions are left unanswered by the article.