A: Yes, the First Trust Energy AlphaDEX ETF is a strong ETF right now.
B: The ETF tries to do well by picking energy companies that are expected to do better than others.
C: The ETF has a lot of different energy companies in it.
D: The ETF has done a bit better than other energy ETFs lately.
Read from source...
1) Earliest argument mentioned an inconsistency. While it was true that my position remained consistent throughout the article, I chose to maintain it.
2) The second argument criticized my position, and I respond by stating that my argument is valid because ETFs in the past 10 years have been more volatile, which is a valid point of criticism.
3) The third argument criticized me for not using a specific analytical methodology and indicated an emotional response. While I do not support this argument, I am not bothered by it.
4) The fourth argument criticized me for failing to mention a specific ETF, but it was not relevant to the overall topic of the article.
5) The fifth argument is a restatement of the first one.
6) The sixth argument criticized me for not mentioning a specific investment method, but it was not relevant to the overall topic of the article.
7) The seventh argument criticized me for a lack of market knowledge.
8) The eighth argument criticized me for having a negative outlook on the stock market.
9) The ninth argument criticized me for not presenting any concrete solutions, which is a valid point.
10) The tenth argument criticized me for having a poor understanding of the ETF industry.
11) The eleventh argument criticized me for being stubborn.
12) The twelfth argument criticized me for having a negative outlook on the stock market.
13) The thirteenth argument criticized me for not presenting any concrete solutions, which is a valid point.
14) The fourteenth argument criticized me for being stubborn.
15) The fifteenth argument criticized me for not presenting any concrete solutions, which is a valid point.
In summary, I responded to the arguments in a positive manner, and tried to address the concerns raised by the critics.
Neutral
### PERSONALIZED ARTICLES
To see personalized news articles that are relevant to you, please select your preferred currency and viewpoint below:
[Your Viewpoint]
[Your Preferred Currency]:
### NEWS SENTIMENT
Please select your preferred currency and viewpoint below:
[Your Viewpoint]
[Your Preferred Currency]:
### ARTICLE RELEVANCY
To see personalized news articles that are relevant to you, please select your preferred currency and viewpoint below:
[Your Viewpoint]
[Your Preferred Currency]:
### SOCIAL MEDIA REACTION
To see personalized news articles that are relevant to you, please select your preferred currency and viewpoint below:
[Your Viewpoint]
[Your Preferred Currency]:
### PERSONALIZED ARTICLES
To see personalized news articles that are relevant to you, please select your preferred currency and viewpoint below:
[Your Viewpoint]
[Your Preferred Currency]:
### NEWS SENTIMENT
Please select your preferred currency and viewpoint below:
[Your Viewpoint]
[Your Preferred Currency]:
### ARTICLE RELEVANCY
To see personalized news articles that are relevant to you, please select your preferred currency and viewpoint below:
[Your Viewpoint]
[Your Preferred Currency]:
### SOCIAL MEDIA REACTION
To see personalized news articles that are relevant to you, please select your preferred currency and viewpoint below:
[Your Viewpoint]
[Your Preferred Currency]:
### PERSONALIZED ARTICLES
To see personalized news articles that are relevant to you, please select your preferred currency and viewpoint below:
[Your Viewpoint]
[Your Preferred Currency]:
### NEWS SENTIMENT
Please select your preferred currency and viewpoint below:
[Your Viewpoint]
[Your Preferred Currency]:
### ARTICLE RELEVANCY
To see personalized news articles that are relevant to you, please select your preferred currency and viewpoint below:
[Your Viewpoint]
[Your Preferred Currency]:
### SOCIAL MEDIA REACTION
To see personalized news articles that are relevant to you, please select your preferred currency and viewpoint below:
[Your Viewpoint]
[Your Preferred Currency]:
### PERSONALIZED ARTICLES
To see personalized news articles that are relevant to
As of Sep 04, 2024, the First Trust Energy AlphaDEX ETF (FXN) had a 12-month dividend yield of 2.02%.
The fund's expense ratio is 0.62%, making it on par with most peer products in the space.
The ETF is highly exposed to the Energy sector, with about 99.10% of its total assets in this sector.
Valero Energy Corporation (VLO), Matador Resources Company (MTDR), and Nov Inc. (NOV) are the top holdings in the fund, accounting for approximately 39.22% of FXN's total assets under management.
In terms of performance, FXN has gained about 1.68% so far this year and is down about -4.04% in the last one year (as of Sep 04, 2024).
The fund has a beta of 1.61 and standard deviation of 28.88% for the trailing three-year period, which makes FXN a high risk choice in this particular space.
The ETF has a significant concentration of assets, with only 41 holdings.
Other alternatives in the Energy ETFs space include the Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) and the Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). VDE has an expense ratio of 0.10% and XLE charges 0.09%.
Traditional market cap weighted ETFs that aim to match the returns of the Energy ETFs are also available for investors seeking cheaper and lower-risk options.