A big company called Google uses special computer brains, called AI models, to help it find answers and show them to people when they search on the internet. But some websites like The New York Times and CNN are not letting Google use their information to teach these AI models. This is because they think Google might take away their visitors who want to read their articles. So now, Google has less information to make its computer brains smarter and better at finding answers. Read from source...

- The article is based on a single source (The Atlantic) and does not provide any evidence or data to support its claims about Google's AI impact on web traffic distribution.
- The article assumes that users will no longer visit external sites if they get direct answers from Google's AI, which is a speculative and unrealistic scenario. Users are still curious and want to explore more information beyond what Google can provide them.
- The article ignores the potential benefits of AI for both users and publishers, such as increasing relevance, efficiency, and engagement. AI can also help publishers to create better content and monetize their audiences more effectively.
- The article focuses on the negative aspects of the AI copyright dispute between The New York Times and OpenAI, without considering the broader context of innovation, competition, and collaboration in the AI industry. The article also lacks objectivity and fairness by presenting Elon Musk's accusations as facts, without questioning his motives or credibility.
- The article uses emotional language and tone, such as "trouble", "resistance", "concerns", and "stealing", to sensationalize the issue and attract attention, rather than providing a balanced and rational analysis.