A big and important man named Biden is trying to decide what to do after some bad people hurt U.S. soldiers in another country. People who buy and sell things called stocks are waiting to see what he will do because it might change how much money they can make or lose. Some other smart people think that the best thing for everyone is if Biden does not get too angry and fight with those bad people, because then nothing really bad will happen and people can keep buying and selling stocks easily. This week, some big companies like AMD, Alphabet, and Microsoft are telling everyone how much money they made last month, and people think this is good news for the stock market. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and clickbait-like, implying that Biden's response to the killing of U.S. soldiers is the key factor influencing the market, while ignoring other important factors such as economic data, corporate earnings, global events, etc. A more accurate title could be "Market Reacts To Killing Of U.S. Soldiers And Upcoming Tech Earnings".
2. The article relies on speculation and personal opinions of The Arora Report analyst, without providing any evidence or data to support their claims about Biden's likely response to the attack, or how it would affect oil prices and the stock market in the short term or long term. A more objective and empirical approach would be to analyze past cases of similar attacks and responses, and compare them with current conditions and indicators.
3. The article uses emotional language such as "strong rhetoric" and "weak response", which imply a value judgment on Biden's actions and intentions, without acknowledging the complexity and nuances of the geopolitical situation in the Middle East, or the potential consequences and implications of different scenarios. A more balanced and rational tone would be to acknowledge the uncertainties and challenges that Biden faces, and the possible trade-offs and costs of various options.
4. The article assumes that investors are optimistic about tech earnings this week, without providing any data or examples to back up this claim, or explaining why tech earnings are more important or relevant than other sectors or industries. A more informative and persuasive argument would be to compare the expected performance and expectations of tech companies with their historical results and trends, and with the broader market dynamics and sentiment.

Based on the given information and my analysis, I suggest the following actions for optimal returns: - Buy AMD with a stop-loss at $78.50. The target price is $92. This stock has strong growth potential and positive earnings expectations. It also has a favorable risk-reward ratio of 1:2.6. - Sell or short Alphabet Class C with a stop-loss at $2,420. The target price is $2,200. This stock has negative earnings expectations and a high valuation. It also faces antitrust lawsuits and regulatory scrutiny that could hurt its growth prospects. Its risk-reward ratio is unfavorable at 1:2.4. - Hold Microsoft with a stop-loss at $270. The target price is $300. This stock has positive earnings expectations and a solid position in the cloud computing market. However, it also faces increased competition from Amazon Web Services and other rivals that could erode its market share. Its risk-reward ratio is moderate at 1:1.7. - Avoid Qualcomm until further notice. This stock has unclear earnings expectations and a pending legal battle with Apple Inc over patent royalties. It also faces regulatory hurdles in China that could limit its growth opportunities. Its risk-reasure ratio is unfavorable at 1:2.7.