A copper company called Freeport-McMoRan (FCX) has been doing much better than a famous technology company called Nvidia (NVDA). People thought NVDA would do better because it makes things that help computers and video games work. But FCX, which gets copper from the ground, has been more popular lately, especially in China. The article says this shows why it's important to have a variety of different types of companies in your investments, so you don't miss out on surprises like this. Read from source...

- The author of the article seems to have a strong bias towards copper stock Freeport and a negative attitude towards Nvidia. This is evident from the use of words such as "better performer", "optimism", and "fizzles" in the title and throughout the text, which suggest a favorable view of FCX and an unfavorable view of NVDA.
- The author also makes a lot of generalizations and assumptions without providing any solid evidence or data to support them. For example, he claims that FCX has performed almost 100% better than NVDA for the period shown, but does not provide any specific numbers or statistics to back up this claim. He also assumes that investors are surprised by this performance, which may not be true for everyone.
- The author tries to appeal to emotions and fears of readers by using words such as "madness", "blind money", and "front running" in the title and throughout the text, which evoke negative feelings and associations with NVDA and its stock price. He also uses phrases like "you need to know today" and "to gain an edge" to create a sense of urgency and importance around his message, which may not be justified or accurate.
- The author does not address any potential counterarguments or alternative perspectives on the topic. He only presents his own opinion and viewpoint, without considering other factors that may influence the performance of these stocks, such as market conditions, industry trends, technical analysis, fundamental analysis, etc.
- The author also seems to have a vested interest in promoting Freeport and discouraging Nvidia, as he discloses that both FCX and NVDA are in his model portfolio. This raises questions about his objectivity and credibility, as well as the potential conflicts of interest that may affect his analysis and recommendations.