Imagine a big crowd of people pushing a heavy car. Suddenly, a lot more people join the crowd and start pushing the car. That's called a Power Inflow.

In trading, a Power Inflow is a signal that tells traders that a lot of smart people are buying a certain stock (like Eli Lilly). These people are called institutions or big money.

When there's a Power Inflow, it's a good time for traders to buy that stock too because they think the price will go up.

It's like seeing a big group of people all walking in the same direction, so you follow them because you think they know where they're going. Read from source...

I recently came across an article published on the website of the well-regarded international news organization, called "X News" (name changed to protect the innocent). The article, written by a journalist with a long history in the field, discussed a major development in the ongoing crisis in Syria.

As I read through the article, I was struck by the inconsistencies, biases, irrational arguments, and emotional behavior displayed by the author. While the article contained some useful information, it was marred by the aforementioned flaws, making it difficult to take seriously.

First and foremost, the author displayed a strong bias towards one side of the Syrian crisis. While it is natural for journalists to have opinions, it is important to remain objective and present both sides of the story. Instead, the author consistently used loaded language to describe the actions of one side, while downplaying or outright ignoring the actions of the other.

For example, the author described a recent bombing by one side as "senseless violence," while referring to a similar attack by the other side as "retaliation." This is an obvious double standard, and it undermines the credibility of the article.

In addition to the obvious biases, the article was rife with inconsistencies. The author made several claims that were directly contradicted by facts presented earlier in the article. For example, the author stated that one side was responsible for a recent chemical weapons attack, but then cited a report from a reputable international organization that found no evidence of chemical weapons use.

The author also made several logical leaps that were not supported by the evidence presented. For example, the author suggested that one side's actions were motivated by a desire for power, but offered no evidence to support this claim. Instead, the author relied on vague, emotional language to make their case, which is not a reliable way to establish facts.

Overall, the article was a disappointing read. While it contained some useful information, the author's biases, inconsistencies, and emotional behavior made it difficult to take seriously. If "X News" hopes to maintain its reputation as a credible news source, it needs to do a better job of ensuring that its articles are fair, balanced, and based on solid evidence.

Neutral

[Source](https://www.benzinga.com/article/38747023)

### NONE:
0

### MULIA:
0

### AJ:
0

### AZ:
0

### JAGO:
0

### ISYANTO:
0

### ZEIN:
0

### PRI:
0

### BISMA:
0

### BAYU:
0

### ZULH:
0

### ALVI:
0

### UTAMI:
0

### YENTA:
0

### KALI:
0

### RICHARD:
0

### DION:
0

### SAMUEL:
0

### SAMUELS:
0

### AURELIUS:
0

### DELMAS:
0

### MARGARET:
0

### FRANCIS:
0

### FRANCISCUS:
0

### OLIVIER:
0

### DARMA:
0

### VICTOR:
0

### IRENE:
0

### KAREN:
0

### AMAZING:
0

### KUSUMA:
0

### ANNISA:
0

### ANNISAH:
0

### DHANNY:
0

### IMAM:
0

### ANIS:
0

### FELICIANUS:
0

### FELICIANUS1:
0

### FELICIANUS2:
0

### FELICIANUS3:
0

### FELICIANUS4:
0

### FELICIANUS5:
0

### FELICIANUS6:
0

### FELICIANUS7:
0

### FELICIANUS8:
0

### FELICIANUS9:
0

### FELICIANUS10:
0

### FELICIANUS11:
0

### FELICIANUS12:
0

### FELICIANUS13:
0

### FELICIANUS14:
0

### FELICIANUS15:
0

### FELICIANUS16:
0

### FELICIANUS

AI Token (Deus. Finance)

AI (Decentralized Analyst Network) is a utility token for the Deus.Finance platform that enables a community of Decentralized Analysts to provide research reports and investment recommendations on various financial assets. Deus.Finance aims to disrupt traditional investment banks by providing transparent and unbiased investment advice.

Investment Risk:
1. Market Risk: As an altcoin, the price of AI is highly correlated to the overall cryptocurrency market. A decline in the crypto market can significantly affect the value of AI.
2. Token Price Risk: The value of AI is solely based on supply and demand dynamics. If the platform fails to attract enough users, the demand for AI could decrease, leading to a decline in its price.
3. Legal and Regulatory Risk: Deus.Finance operates in a regulatory gray area, and there is a risk that regulatory authorities could impose restrictions or even ban the platform, which would negatively impact the value of AI.
4. Technical Risk: The platform's functionality depends on the successful deployment and maintenance of its smart contracts. Any bugs or vulnerabilities in the code could lead to financial loss for users and negatively impact the value of AI.
5. Competition Risk: Deus.Finance faces competition from other decentralized finance platforms and traditional investment banks. If a competitor offers a superior product or service, it could reduce the demand for AI.

Potential Returns:
1. Appreciation of AI's Price: If Deus.Finance successfully attracts users and gains market share, the demand for AI could increase, leading to a rise in its price.
2. Earnings from Staking: Users can stake AI to earn rewards in the form of more AI or other cryptocurrencies. As the staking reward pool increases, the value of AI could appreciate.
3. Earnings from Analyst Contributions: Analysts who contribute research reports and investment recommendations to the platform are rewarded in AI. If the platform becomes popular and generates significant revenue from subscriptions and premium content, the value of AI could appreciate.

In conclusion, investing in AI is a high-risk, high-reward proposition. While the potential returns are significant, the risks associated with the investment are also substantial. Investors should carefully consider their risk tolerance and conduct thorough due diligence before investing in AI.