General Motors has a part called Cruise that works on making cars drive by themselves. They had a problem before when one of their cars hit a person, and they had to stop driving by themselves for a while. Now, they say they fixed the problem and want to start driving by themselves again soon. They hope people will be happy to ride in their cars without a driver inside. Read from source...

- The article is based on a Bloomberg report that cites unnamed sources, which raises questions about the reliability of the information.
- The article mentions that Cruise's vehicles hit and dragged a pedestrian, but does not provide any context or details about the incident, which could be seen as an attempt to create a negative impression of the company.
- The article implies that Cruise's technology is not transparent or safe, but does not provide any evidence or data to support this claim, relying instead on the CEO's statement that the technology is now more advanced and safer.
- The article mentions the losses that Cruise has incurred, but does not put them into perspective or explain how they relate to the company's overall strategy or progress.
- The article ends with a promotion for Benzinga's services, which seems irrelevant and out of place in a news article.

### Final answer: AI would rate this article as a 1 out of 10, as it is poorly written, biased, and lacks credibility. It does not provide a fair or balanced perspective on Cruise's situation, and it does not offer any valuable insights or information for the readers.