Western Alliance is a company that makes money by lending it to other companies and people. They just announced that they made more money than people expected in the last three months. This is good news for them and their investors. Some experts who study stocks think that the company is doing so well that they have raised their predictions for how much the company's stock will be worth. Read from source...

1. The title of the article is misleading and clickbait: "These Analysts Boost Their Forecasts On Western Alliance After Upbeat Earnings". It implies that multiple analysts have increased their price targets or expectations for Western Alliance, but in reality, only two analysts are mentioned, Piper Sandler and Barclays, which is not enough to generalize such a claim.

2. The article contains a large image that takes up a significant portion of the text, making it difficult to read and navigate. The image is irrelevant to the content of the article, as it is just a generic image of a stock chart. This is not a professional way to present financial information.

3. The article does not provide any details or explanations for why Western Alliance reported upbeat quarterly results, nor does it compare the results to analyst consensus estimates or previous results. It simply states that the company beat the estimates for earnings and revenue, without providing any context or analysis.

4. The article quotes statements from the company's CEO, but does not provide any analysis or commentary on the statements, nor does it compare them to the company's previous statements or performance. The quotes are presented as if they are self-explanatory and require no further explanation or interpretation.

5. The article does not provide any details or analysis on the changes made by Piper Sandler and Barclays to their price targets on Western Alliance, nor does it compare their new targets to the current market price or their previous targets. It simply states that both analysts raised their price targets, without providing any reasons or justifications for the changes.

6. The article ends with an advertisement for Benzinga's services, which is inappropriate and unprofessional, as it detracts from the credibility and objectivity of the article. It also creates a conflict of interest, as Benzinga may benefit from promoting the stock and attracting more readers to its platform.