So, this article talks about a big company called IBM that makes computers and other things. Some people who watch the stock market think that IBM's price might go up or down soon. They use special numbers and signs to help them guess what will happen. Two of these people said they think IBM is worth more than it costs now, but one person thinks it is just okay. The article also says there are different ways to bet on IBM going up or down, but that can be risky. Read from source...

1. The article does not provide any clear or coherent thesis statement about what the big money is thinking about IBM. It jumps from different aspects of the company without establishing a central claim or argument.
2. The article relies heavily on outdated and irrelevant information, such as RSI indicators, which are not useful for predicting stock prices in the short term. It also cites expert opinions that are older than 30 days, which may no longer reflect the current market situation.
3. The article uses vague and ambiguous terms to describe IBM's market status, such as "approaching overbought" and "may be". These phrases do not provide any concrete or actionable insights for investors or traders who want to make informed decisions based on the article.
4. The article ignores other important factors that may affect IBM's performance, such as its revenue growth, earnings per share, dividend yield, debt ratio, competitive advantage, industry trends, etc. It focuses only on the stock price and volume, which are not sufficient indicators of a company's value or potential.
5. The article shows signs of emotional bias towards IBM, as it uses positive words such as "big money", "best" without providing any evidence or reasoning to support them. It also uses negative words such as "approaching overbought" and "may be" without acknowledging the possibility of contrary or alternative views.
6. The article does not provide any personal story or experience of the author, which would make it more credible and relatable for the readers. It also does not invite any feedback or questions from the audience, which would create a dialogue and engagement around the topic.

Neutral
Summary: The article is mainly informative and provides some analysis on IBM's options. It does not express any strong opinions or sentiments about the company or its stock performance.

To provide comprehensive investment recommendations from the article titled "IBM's Options: A Look at What the Big Money is Thinking", I will first analyze the key points from the text, then apply my own judgment and knowledge of the market, and finally present a summary of my findings.