Two stocks in the communication services sector that are not doing very well and might be bad choices for investors who want to make money quickly. The article talks about how to decide which stocks are good or bad using a tool called RSI, which measures how strong a stock is compared to its recent past performance. Read from source...

1. The title of the article is misleading and clickbait, as it implies that there are only two tech and telecom stocks to avoid in May, while in reality, there may be more than two, or the situation could change quickly. A better title would be something like "Two Tech And Telecom Stocks That Show Signs Of Weakness In May"
2. The author does not provide any evidence or data to support his claim that these stocks are worth dumping. He only uses a momentum indicator (RSI) without explaining what it is, how it works, or why it is relevant for the tech and telecom sector. A more thorough analysis would include other indicators, such as price-to-earnings ratio, revenue growth, dividend yield, etc.
3. The author does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest, such as owning shares of these stocks or receiving compensation from third parties for promoting them. This could raise doubts about his credibility and motives for writing the article. A transparent disclosure would help readers understand where he is coming from and how to evaluate his recommendations.
4. The author does not address any potential risks or opportunities associated with dumping these stocks, such as market volatility, tax implications, alternative investments, etc. He only focuses on the negative aspects of holding them, without considering the possible benefits or trade-offs. A more balanced approach would help readers make informed decisions based on their own goals and preferences.
5. The author does not engage with any counterarguments or opposing views in his article. He seems to have a biased and dogmatic stance against these stocks, without acknowledging that there may be other perspectives or factors that could influence their performance. A more open-minded and critical attitude would make the article more valuable and persuasive for readers who are interested in learning about different opinions and scenarios.

Overall, I think this article is poorly written and lacks credibility, accuracy, and completeness. It does not provide enough information or evidence to support its claims, nor does it consider the possible consequences or alternatives of its advice. I would not trust this author or his recommendations, and I would look for other sources of information that are more reliable and objective.

There are several factors that could affect the performance of these stocks in May. Some of them are:

- The overall market sentiment and direction, which could be influenced by economic indicators, geopolitical events, earnings reports, etc.
- The specific sector trends and dynamics, such as competition, innovation, regulation, customer demand, etc.
- The company-specific factors, such as management quality, financial health, growth potential, corporate governance, etc.
- The valuation metrics, such as price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-sales (P/S), price-to-book (P/B), dividend yield, earnings per share (EPS), etc.