Alright kiddo, let me tell you what's happening with Alibaba stock on Wednesday. So, Alibaba is a big company that owns another company called Daraz Group. Daraz Group sells things online in many countries. But now, Daraz Group is having some problems because not enough people are buying things from them. They tried to save money by laying off some of their workers last year, but it's still not enough. So they have to do it again and let more workers go. This makes Alibaba stock go down in value, which is what we call "going on with" the stock. Does that make sense? Read from source...

- The article starts with a sensational headline that implies something is wrong or negative about Alibaba stock on Wednesday, but does not provide any specific details or reasons. This creates a false impression of urgency and fear among readers without giving them any factual basis to make informed decisions.
- The article uses vague terms like "market challenges" and "unprecedented challenges" without explaining what they are or how they affect Daraz Group's performance. These terms are overused and abused in the business media to create a sense of uncertainty and instability, but do not offer any concrete information or analysis.
- The article focuses on Daraz Group's layoffs as the main event or story, without giving enough context or background about its role within Alibaba's International Digital Commerce Group. This makes it seem like Daraz is a standalone company that has no connection or relevance to Alibaba, which is not true.
- The article quotes James Dong as the source of information, without mentioning his position or authority within the company. This creates a lack of credibility and transparency, as readers do not know who he is or why they should trust him. Additionally, the article does not provide any other sources or evidence to support or verify his claims about Daraz's financial situation or layoffs.
- The article ends with a brief summary that repeats some of the same information from the headline and the beginning, without adding anything new or useful for readers. This shows a lack of coherence and structure in the writing, as well as an absence of depth and insight in the reporting.